-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
update noresm_develop to noresm2_3_develop changes for oslo_aero #128
update noresm_develop to noresm2_3_develop changes for oslo_aero #128
Conversation
…THISToslo_v0d.betzy_intel.cam-outfrq9s passes
…THISToslo_v0d.betzy_intel.cam-outfrq9s passes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall looks good but I'm in favor of more cleanup and less commented out code and XML entries (see questions).
Also, at least one test name needs to change.
…nd new entry in Externals_CAM.cfg
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I still think some cleanup is necessary.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good now, thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This time for sure!
update noresm develop to noresm2 3 develop changes for oslo_aero
Summary:
Contributors: mvertens
Reviewers: gold2718
Purpose of changes: To bring in noresm2_3_develop updates into noresm_develop in order to start coupled model simulations. #130
Github PR URL: #128
Changes made to build system:
Changes made to the namelist: New use cases for NF1850oslo and NF1850
Changes to the defaults for the boundary datasets: None (other than those coming in from the use cases)
Substantial timing or memory changes: None (although this has not been checked)
Testing:
The sandbox used was noresm2_5_alpha01 with the updated CAM. This has a different CLM external than
the current head of noresm_develop for CAM. So all baseline comparisons failed. It would be helpful to include an aquaplanet test for these PRs so that we can verify baseline diffs for some cases regardless of the CLM tag that is present in the CAM externals.
Ran updated aux_cam_noresm tests on betzy - which now has the following testlist and status.
ERP_D_Ln9_P18.ne3pg3_ne3pg3_mg37.NFLTHISToslo_v0d.betzy_intel.cam-outfrq9s (Overall: PASS) details:
ERP_D_Ln9_P256.f19_f19_mtn14.F1850.betzy_intel.cam-outfrq9s (Overall: PASS) details:
ERP_D_Ln9_P36.f10_f10_mg37.F2000climo.betzy_intel.cam-outfrq9s (Overall: PASS) details:
ERP_D_Ln9_P36.ne3pg3_ne3pg3_mg37.FLTHIST_v0d.betzy_intel.cam-outfrq9s (Overall: PASS) details:
ERP_D_Ln9_P36.ne3pg3_ne3pg3_mg37.NFLTHISTghgmam4_v0d.betzy_intel.cam-outfrq9s (Overall: PASS) details:
ERP_Ln9.ne30pg3_ne30pg3_mtn14.NF1850oslo.betzy_intel.cam-outfrq9s (Overall: PASS) details:
ERP_Ln9.ne30pg3_ne30pg3_mtn14.NF1850tropmam4.betzy_intel.cam-outfrq9s (Overall: PASS) details:
ERP_Ln9.ne30pg3_ne30pg3_mtn14.NF2000oslo.betzy_intel.cam-outfrq9s (Overall: PASS) details:
ERP_Ln9.ne30pg3_ne30pg3_mtn14.NF2000tropmam4.betzy_intel.cam-outfrq9s (Overall: PASS) details:
SMS_D_Ln9_P18.ne3pg3_ne3pg3_mg37.NF2000oslo.betzy_intel.cam-outfrq9s (Overall: PASS) details:
SMS_D_Ln9_P256.f19_f19_mtn14.F2000climo.betzy_intel.cam-outfrq9s (Overall: PASS) details:
Generated new baselines on betzy noresm_v9_cam6_3_123.